Slomowitz v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Slomowitz v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

613 So. 2d 55, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13738, 1992 WL 385495

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 30, 1992·No. No. 92-0843·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the denial of unemployment benefits. The employer contended that appellant was fired for misconduct, namely the continued failure to properly complete cash register transactions on a timely basis after repeated warnings. Appellee denies that she knew about these policies. The referee is the judge of the credibility of the witnesses, not this court. Continental Baking Co. v. Vilchez, 219 So.2d 733 (Fla.2d DCA 1969). Finding competent substantial evidence to support the determination of the appeals referee, we affirm.

HERSEY and WARNER, JJ., and WALDEN, JAMES H„ Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the denial of unemployment benefits. The employer contended that appellant was fired for misconduct, namely the continued failure to properly complete cash register transactions on a timely basis after repeated warnings. Appellee denies that she knew about these policies. The referee is the judge of the credibility of the witnesses, not this court. Continental Baking Co. v. Vilchez, 219 So.2d 733 (Fla.2d DCA 1969). Finding competent substantial evidence to support the determination of the appeals referee, we affirm.

HERSEY and WARNER, JJ., and WALDEN, JAMES H„ Senior Judge, concur.

Slomowitz v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 613 So. 2d 55, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13738, 1992 WL 385495 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

613 So. 2d 55 (Slomowitz v. Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related