Slomovic v. Ves Carpenter Contractors, Inc.

292 So. 2d 60, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7717
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 29, 1974·No. No. 73-1184·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

DOWNEY, Judge.

This interlocutory appeal from an order of the trial court granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to Count I of the amended complaint and striking certain portions of the prayer of Count II of the amended complaint, is reversed on authority of Zimmerman v. Diedrich, Fla. 1957, 97 So.2d 120; Koplon v. Smith, Fla. 1973, 271 So.2d 762; Dolan v. Wright, 289 So.2d 777, 4th DCA, Opinion filed February 15, 1974.

It would have been most helpful in this case had appellees filed a brief as required by rule 3.7(b), F.A.R., 32 F.S.A. Once again, attention is drawn to an appellee’s responsibility thereunder to support the ruling of the trial court (or concede error) and assist the appellate court through the medium of a responsive brief. Holden v. City of Ft. Lauderdale, Fla.App. 1973, 286 So.2d 218.

Reversed.

WALDEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Slomovic v. Ves Carpenter Contractors, Inc., 292 So. 2d 60, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7717 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

292 So. 2d 60 (Slomovic v. Ves Carpenter Contractors, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lakes of Emerald Hills v. Silverman
558 So. 2d 442 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Cain v. Cain
549 So. 2d 1161 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Rubin v. Randwest Corporation
292 So. 2d 60 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)