Sloma v. Sloma

148 A.D.3d 1680, 48 N.Y.S.3d 902
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sloma v. Sloma. Read the opinion of the Court — 148 A.D.3d 1679
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 24, 2017·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (James R. Griffith, J.), entered March 14, 2014 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order denied the motion of respondent to vacate an order entered February 6, 2014.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

[1681]*1681Same memorandum as in Matter of Sloma v Sloma ([appeal No. 1] 148 AD3d 1679 [2017]).

Present — Centra, J.P., Peradot-to, DeJoseph, Curran and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sloma v. Sloma, 148 A.D.3d 1680, 48 N.Y.S.3d 902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

148 A.D.3d 1680 (Sloma v. Sloma) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sloma v. Sloma
148 A.D.3d 1679 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)