Slocumb v. Housing Authority

115 S.E.2d 459, 101 Ga. App. 765, 1960 Ga. App. LEXIS 1003
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 6, 1960·No. 37941·Published

Opinion

Nichols, Judge.

“Where a proceeding in rem is brought to condemn property- for a public use únder the provisions of Chapter 36-11 of .the Code as amended, by the Act. of 19.38, tender of the amount awarded -,by the assessors to tfye apparent or ostensible owner of such property, is not a condition precedent to the condemnor’s right to pay the award into the registry of the court and enter an appeal to a jury.” State Highway Dept. v. Hendrix, 215 Ga. 821 (113 S. E. 2d 761). Slocumb v. Housing Authority of Columbus, 216 Ga. 70 (114 S. E. 2d 537).

In the present case the motion of the condemnees to dismiss the ' appeal to- the' jury by the condemnor because the amount of ■ the assessors’ award was not -first tendered • to them before being paid into the registry -of the court was correctly overruled. The second case cited above is the answer o.f the Su[766] preme Court to a certified question by this court in this case.

Decided June 6, 1960. John G. Cozart, for plaintiffs in error. Foley, Chappell, Kelley & Champion, Forrest L. Champion, Jr., Kenneth M. Henson, .contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Felton, C. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Slocumb v. Housing Authority, 115 S.E.2d 459, 101 Ga. App. 765, 1960 Ga. App. LEXIS 1003 (Ga. Ct. App. 1960).

115 S.E.2d 459 (Slocumb v. Housing Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Highway Department v. Hendrix
113 S.E.2d 761 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1960)
State Highway Department v. Farmers Gin Co.
114 S.E.2d 537 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1960)