Slocumb v. Delaney

Fourth Circuit

Slocumb v. Delaney

422 F. App'x 272

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 8, 2011·No. No. 10-6617·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Conrad L. Slocumb, a state prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Slocumb v. Delaney, No. 9:09-cv-00458-HMH, 2010 WL 1345270 (D.S.C. Mar. 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Conrad L. Slocumb, a state prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Slocumb v. Delaney, No. 9:09-cv-00458-HMH, 2010 WL 1345270 (D.S.C. Mar. 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Slocumb v. Delaney, 422 F. App'x 272 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

422 F. App'x 272 (Slocumb v. Delaney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related