Slocumb v. Cape Fear Shingle Co.
This text of 14 S.E. 622 (Slocumb v. Cape Fear Shingle Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Eliminating all irrelevant matter with which the record is confused and cumbered, we find when we uncover the real issue that but a singlé question is involved, and the controversy is in a nut-shell. Conceding that an officer of a corporation has general authority from the company to confess judgment, is he empowered to go before the Clerk of the Superior Court and, by a formal compliance with the requirements of the statute, submit to such judgment by confession for two hundred dollars, or a smaller sum? We think not. The Constitution, Art. 4, §27, confers upon Justices of the Peace jurisdiction of “civil actions founded on contract wherein the sum. demanded shall not exceed two hundred dollars, and wherever the title to real estate shall not be in controversy.”
Consent of parties may change the venue for trial, but cannot give jurisdiction to a tribunal the exercise of which, by express provision of law, is conferred upon and limited to another Court.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 S.E. 622, 110 N.C. 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slocumb-v-cape-fear-shingle-co-nc-1892.