Slocum v. Watkins
1 Denio 631
Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors·Decided September 15, 1845·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The referee had power to impose the payment of costs as a condition to granting the adjournment, which power he exercised by making it a condition that they should be paid. The defendant not being prepared to make payment as required by the order, his attorney stipulated that they should be paid when taxed. The referee had a right to require payment or such a stipulation. (Butler v. Bates, 5 Hill, 375.) The defendant having refused to pay after taxation and a demand, the motion should be granted with costs.
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Slocum v. Watkins, 1 Denio 631 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).
1 Denio 631 (Slocum v. Watkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gamble v. Taylor
43 How. Pr. 375 (New York Supreme Court, 1872)