Slocum v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Slocum v. State

471 S.W.3d 803, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1017, 2015 WL 5823934

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 6, 2015

DocketNo. ED 102551

StatusPublished

This text of 471 S.W.3d 803 (Slocum v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Slocum v. State, 471 S.W.3d 803, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1017, 2015 WL 5823934 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

[804]*804 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Leonard Slocum appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15¹ motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Burston v. State, 343 S.W.3d 691, 693 (MoApp.E.D. 2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however; provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[804]*804 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Leonard Slocum appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15¹ motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Burston v. State, 343 S.W.3d 691, 693 (MoApp.E.D. 2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however; provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

471 S.W.3d 803, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1017, 2015 WL 5823934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slocum-v-state-moctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack