Slocum v. Boyle (In re Joshua Slocum Ltd.)

121 B.R. 442, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17342
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania·Decided October 25, 1989·No. Civ. A. No. 89-6490·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

JAMES McGIRR KELLY, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 25th day of October, 1989, in consideration of the appeal of appellant Gregory Boyle from an Order of the United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, dated October 3, 1989, and the appellee’s response thereto, and the court finding that the findings of fact of the Bankruptcy Court are not clearly erroneous, and the conclusions of law based thereon are consistent with the law, and the failure of the appellant to raise any issue relating to the Bankruptcy Court’s alternative holding under 15 P.S. [443] § 1701(B)(4), (5), the Order of August 3, 1989, of the Bankruptcy Court, 103 B.R. 610, is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Slocum v. Boyle (In re Joshua Slocum Ltd.), 121 B.R. 442, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17342 (E.D. Pa. 1989).

121 B.R. 442 (Slocum v. Boyle (In re Joshua Slocum Ltd.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Joshua Slocum Ltd.
121 B.R. 442 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1989)