Slochowsky v. Shang
400 N.E.2d 1348, 48 N.Y.2d 887, 424 N.Y.S.2d 896, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2508
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Judgment affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (67 AD2d 926).
[889]*889Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Slochowsky v. Shang, 400 N.E.2d 1348, 48 N.Y.2d 887, 424 N.Y.S.2d 896, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2508 (N.Y. 1979).
400 N.E.2d 1348 (Slochowsky v. Shang) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dora T. J. v. Jean-Paul A. S.
224 A.D.2d 420 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Monroe County Department of Social Services v. Palermo
192 A.D.2d 1114 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Summers v. D'Elia
95 A.D.2d 184 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Rosenfeld v. Blum
82 A.D.2d 559 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Leone v. Blum
73 A.D.2d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)