Sloat v. Plymton

22 F. Cas. 330

This text of 22 F. Cas. 330 (Sloat v. Plymton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sloat v. Plymton, 22 F. Cas. 330 (circtedpa 1846).

Opinion

An absolute acquiescence by a patentee in the adverse possession and enjoyment of his rights by a stranger would, under ordinary circumstances. for a period much less than six years, offer a strong argument against the grant of the injunction before a final decree.

[Cited in 2 'Whart. Dig. 415. to the point as stated abrve. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 F. Cas. 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sloat-v-plymton-circtedpa-1846.