Sloat v. Community School District 15

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sloat v. Community School District 15

191 A.D.2d 572, 595 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2282

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 191 A.D.2d 572 (Sloat v. Community School District 15) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sloat v. Community School District 15, 191 A.D.2d 572, 595 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2282 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent dated March 23, 1990, which, after a hearing, found the petitioner guilty of various acts of misconduct and terminated his services as a tenured teacher.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, with costs, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the determination under review was supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Stork Rest. v Boland, 282 NY 256, 273; see also, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 179; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 230-231; CPLR 7803 [4]). Moreover, we are satisfied that the child witnesses were properly sworn (see, Matter of Jerry v Board of Educ., 50 AD2d 149, 158; CPLR 2309).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent dated March 23, 1990, which, after a hearing, found the petitioner guilty of various acts of misconduct and terminated his services as a tenured teacher.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, with costs, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the determination under review was supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Stork Rest. v Boland, 282 NY 256, 273; see also, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 179; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 230-231; CPLR 7803 [4]). Moreover, we are satisfied that the child witnesses were properly sworn (see, Matter of Jerry v Board of Educ., 50 AD2d 149, 158; CPLR 2309).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 A.D.2d 572, 595 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sloat-v-community-school-district-15-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack