Sloane v. Levine
This text of 21 Misc. 2d 276 (Sloane v. Levine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff’s excuse that he discovered from a conversation with his former attorney “ that he did not feel it was worth his while to bring this case on for trial inasmuch as the amount being sued for was considered relatively small by him ” and that “ he did not tell me, at that time, that the complaint had already been dismissed for lack of prosecution ”, is not a valid and legal one, 17 months having elapsed from the commencement of the action to date of dismissal of the complaint for lack of prosecution, pursuant to section 126 of the Municipal Court Code of the City of New York and a further period of 11 months having elapsed before a motion to vacate the dismissal was made.
The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion denied.
Concur — Steuer, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 Misc. 2d 276, 193 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sloane-v-levine-nyappterm-1959.