Sloane v. Kneher
This text of 246 A.D. 826 (Sloane v. Kneher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order amending, nunc pro tunc, judgment in foreclosure action two months after the original judgment had been entered, by inserting therein an additional aEowance of two hundred doUars costs to the plaintiff, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. There was no inadvertence in omitting the additional aEowance in the original judgment. It does not appear that there was any appHcation for such aEowance. The court was without power to make the amendment in that respect. (Herpe v. Herpe, 225 N. Y. 323.) Young, Carswell, Davis, Adel" and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 A.D. 826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sloane-v-kneher-nyappdiv-1936.