Sloane v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sloane v. City of New York

44 A.D.2d 853, 356 N.Y.S.2d 221, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4916

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 28, 1974·Published

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 10, 1972 and February 14, 1972, respectively, the first denying its motion for summary judgment and the second denying its renewed motion for the same relief (improperly labeled as a motion to reargue). Orders reversed, on the law, without costs, and motions granted. The exclusive remedy available to plaintiff is under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 3, subd. 1, group 16, § 29, subd. 6; Matter of Chilk v. City of New York, 26 A D 2d 425, affd. 22 N Y 2d 661). Gulotta, P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Shapiro and Cohalan JJ. concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 10, 1972 and February 14, 1972, respectively, the first denying its motion for summary judgment and the second denying its renewed motion for the same relief (improperly labeled as a motion to reargue). Orders reversed, on the law, without costs, and motions granted. The exclusive remedy available to plaintiff is under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 3, subd. 1, group 16, § 29, subd. 6; Matter of Chilk v. City of New York, 26 A D 2d 425, affd. 22 N Y 2d 661). Gulotta, P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Shapiro and Cohalan JJ. concur.

Sloane v. City of New York, 44 A.D.2d 853, 356 N.Y.S.2d 221, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

44 A.D.2d 853 (Sloane v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.