Sloan v. Wattles

13 Johns. 158
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1816
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 13 Johns. 158 (Sloan v. Wattles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sloan v. Wattles, 13 Johns. 158 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1816).

Opinion

Per Cúriam.

- /The attorney'might ha-ve altered the, test a nd .return of a writ before it had been served; and the sheriff was fully authorized, by. the attorney, to -make the alteration in case it should be-necessary. .vWe think.the-'sheriff, in this'case, had not proceeded so far hut that he might exercise the power,•given* to 'him/by- the attorney, and that the motion, therefore, fought to he-denied.

Motion-denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCracken v. Richardson
46 N.J.L. 50 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1884)
Bray v. Libby
71 Me. 276 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1880)
Osgood v. Norris
21 N.H. 435 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1850)
Cutler v. Colver
3 Cow. 30 (New York Supreme Court, 1824)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Johns. 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sloan-v-wattles-nysupct-1816.