Sloan v. State

44 S.W. 1095, 39 Tex. Crim. 63, 1898 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 62
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 16, 1898·No. No. 1535.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

*64 DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment final on a forfeited bail bond. The bond was executed on February 22, 1897, by Ross Sloan, as principal, with four sureties, requiring said Sloan to appear before the District Court of Hardeman County to be held April 12, 187. The point was made below that it required the presence of said Ross Sloan at an impossible date and term of the court. This was overruled by the trial court, and judgment final was rendered. This ruling was made a ground of the motion for a new trial, and is assigned as error here. The point is well taken, and the State confesses error. Under the unbroken line of decisions in this State, the judgment must be reversed. See Mackey v. State, 38 Texas Crim. Rep., 24, and authorities there cited. The judgment is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Reversed and ordered dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sloan v. State, 44 S.W. 1095, 39 Tex. Crim. 63, 1898 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 62 (Tex. 1898).

44 S.W. 1095 (Sloan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lopez v. State
678 S.W.2d 197 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1984)
France v. Superior Court of California
255 P. 815 (California Supreme Court, 1927)
Ex Parte Barnett
167 S.W. 845 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914)
General Bonding & Casualty Ins. v. State
165 S.W. 615 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)