Sloan v. State of Washington

• Court: District Court, W.D. Washington
• Decided: March 30, 2023
• Docket: 2:23-cv-00124
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4

5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 GEORGE SLOAN, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00124-RAJ-JRC 11 Petitioner, ORDER FOR SERVICE AND 12 v. ANSWER, § 2254 PETITION 13 STATE OF WASHINGTON, 14 Respondent. 15 16 This is a federal habeas action filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner is currently 17 incarcerated at the King County Jail. The Court, having reviewed petitioner’s federal habeas 18 petition, hereby finds that petitioner may not have yet exhausted his state court remedies as 19 required for a § 2254 petition, and the time for exhausting his state court remedies may not 20 have yet lapsed. Therefore, the Court directs service of the petition and directs respondent 21 to respond only to the question of whether petitioner has exhausted his state court 22 remedies. As such, the Court ORDERS as follows: 23 24 1 (1) Petitioner names State of Washington as respondent. Dkt. 13. The proper 2 respondent to a habeas petition is the “person who has custody over [the petitioner].” 28 U.S.C. § 3 2242; see also § 2243; Brittingham v. United States, 982 F.2d 378 (9th Cir. 1992); Dunne v. 4 Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). The official having custody of petitioner where he is

5 currently confined – King County Jail – is King County Sheriff Patti Cole-Tindall. Accordingly, 6 the Clerk is directed to substitute Sheriff Patti Cole-Tindall as the respondent in this action. If 7 any party believes that Sheriff Cole-Tindall is not the proper respondent, the party shall file a 8 motion to substitute the correct respondent. 9 (2) The Clerk shall arrange for service by certified mail upon respondent and upon 10 the Attorney General of the State of Washington and the King County Prosecuting Attorney’s 11 Office copies of the petition, all documents in support thereof, and this Order. The Clerk shall 12 also direct a copy of this Order and the Court’s pro se instruction sheet to petitioner. 13 (3) Within twenty-one (21) days after such service, respondent is directed to file a 14 response to the petition that addresses only if petitioner has exhausted his state court

15 remedies with respect to the grounds for relief set forth in the petition. At a later date, the 16 Court will direct respondent to file and serve an answer in accordance with Rule 5 of the 17 Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in United States District Courts if the Court deems it 18 appropriate. 19 (4) The directed response will be treated in accordance with LCR 7. Accordingly, on 20 the face of the answer, respondent(s) shall note it for consideration on the fourth Friday after 21 filing. Petitioner may file and serve a response not later than the Monday immediately preceding 22 the Friday designated for consideration of the matter, and respondent(s) may file and serve a 23 reply not later than the Friday designated for consideration of the matter.

24 1 (5) Filing by Parties, Generally 2 All attorneys admitted to practice before this Court are required to file documents 3 electronically via the Court’s CM/ECF system. All filings must indicate in the upper right hand 4 corner the name of the magistrate judge to whom the document is directed.

5 Any document filed with the Court must be accompanied by proof that it has been served 6 upon all parties that have entered a notice of appearance in the underlying matter. 7 (6) Motions 8 Any request for court action shall be set forth in a motion, properly filed and served. 9 Pursuant to LCR 7(b), any argument being offered in support of a motion shall be submitted as a 10 part of the motion itself and not in a separate document. The motion shall include in its caption 11 (immediately below the title of the motion) a designation of the date the motion is to be noted for 12 consideration on the Court’s motion calendar. 13 (7) Direct Communications with District Judge or Magistrate Judge 14 No direct communication is to take place with the District Judge or Magistrate Judge with

15 regard to this case. All relevant information and papers are to be directed to the Clerk. 16 Dated this 30th day of March, 2023. 17

A 18

19 J. Richard Creatura United States Magistrate Judge 20

22 23 24