Sloan v. State

629 So. 2d 963, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13225
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 22, 1993·No. No. 91-01506·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence in this case. However, within sixty days of our mandate appellant may seek mitigation of his sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). See Scates v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla.1992).

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sloan v. State, 629 So. 2d 963, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13225 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

629 So. 2d 963 (Sloan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haisfield v. ACP Florida Holdings, Inc.
629 So. 2d 963 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)