Sloan v. Smith

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: August 24, 2009
• Docket: 09-1476
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1476

SAMUEL H. SLOAN, a/k/a M. Ismail Sloan,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHRISTOPHER P. SMITH; J. L. AYERS, III, Sheriff; MICHAEL W. COX; WILLIAM STARKE MUNDY, III; JAMES C. TURK; WILLIAM G. PETTY; RICHARD S. MILLER; ROY B. WILLETT; LAWRENCE JANOW; MICHAEL GAMBLE; STEPHEN R. PATTISON; RAY FITZGERALD; JOHN P. BUTLER; EUGENE WINGFIELD; FRANK G. DAVIDSON, III; RICHARD GROFF; LISA L. SCHENKEL; KILLIS B. HOWARD; SUE H. ROE; CATHERINE H. KENNEDY; DORCHEN LEIDHOLDT; ROSEMONDE PIERRE- LOUIS; ALEXANDER KARAM; SALVATORE J. MODICA; LANE VANCE; VERIO.NET; KHALID SHAIKH MUHAMMED; GEORGE W. BUSH; GEORGE H.W. BUSH; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; LEIGHTON S. HOUCK; CHARLES ROBERTS; JAY ROBERTS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (6:09-cv-00005-NKM)

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 24, 2009

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel H. Sloan, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Samuel H. Sloan appeals the district court’s order

dismissing as frivolous this civil action. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Sloan v. Smith, No.

6:09-cv-00005-NKM (W.D. Va. Feb. 24, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED