Sloan v. Sharp

167 F.3d 207
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sloan v. Sharp. Read the opinion of the Court — 157 F.3d 980
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 5, 1999·No. 97-20168·Published

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This matter is before us on remand from the United States Supreme Court. Sloan v. Sharp, - U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 32, 142 L.Ed.2d 24 (1998).

It is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings in light of Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775, 118 S.Ct. 2275, 141 L.Ed.2d 662 (1998); and Burlington Industries, Inc., v. Ellerth, 742 U.S. 524, 118 S.Ct. 2257, 141 L.Ed.2d 633 (1998).

VACATED and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sloan v. Sharp, 167 F.3d 207 (5th Cir. 1999).

167 F.3d 207 (Sloan v. Sharp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth
524 U.S. 742 (Supreme Court, 1998)
Faragher v. City of Boca Raton
524 U.S. 775 (Supreme Court, 1998)
United States v. Louisiana
525 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1998)
Sloan v. Sharp
525 U.S. 801 (Supreme Court, 1998)