Sloan v. Oliver

221 So. 2d 435, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5942
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 23, 1969·No. No. 1858·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. In considering the instructions as a whole the law appears to have been fairly presented to the jury. See Southeastern General Corporation v. Gorff, [436] Fla.App.1966, 186 So.2d 273; Staicer v. Hall, Fla.App.1961, 130 So.2d 113; Section 59.041, F.S.1967, F.S.A.

WALDEN, C. J., OWEN, J., and MOORE, JOHN H., II, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sloan v. Oliver, 221 So. 2d 435, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5942 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

221 So. 2d 435 (Sloan v. Oliver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Staicer v. Hall
130 So. 2d 113 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
Southeastern General Corp. v. Gorff
186 So. 2d 273 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)