Sloan v. Loftis
This text of 120 S.E. 781 (Sloan v. Loftis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
On June 1, 1919, O’Brien received a bond for title to a house and lot from Rhodes. On October 19, 1921, Loftis obtained a judgment against O’Brien, which was duly recorded on the general execution docket. On December 1, 1921, O’Brien transferred his bond for title to Mrs. Sloan; and on February 3, 1922, Rhodes conveyed the house and lot to her by warranty deed. On February 27, 1922, the execution was levied upon the house and lot, and Mrs. Sloan interposed her claim. The plaintiff in fi. fa. did not pay or offer to pay the claimant the amount of the purchase-money due by O’Brien to Rhodes under his bond for title, and paid to Rhodes by the claimant. Held, that the trial judge, to whom the case was submitted for decision without a jury, erred in finding the property subject. The judgment was a lien upon the equitable interest of O’Brien in the house and lot (O’Connor v. Georgia R. Bank, 121 Ga. 88, 48 S. E. 716); but it could not be reached by levy until the holder had complied with the provisions of the Civil Code (1910), §§ 6037, 6038. The claimant could take advantage of noncompliance with those provisions, and was entitled to prevail, in the absence of such compliance. Black v. Gate City Coffin Co., 115 Ga. 15 (41 S. E. 259).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 S.E. 781, 157 Ga. 93, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sloan-v-loftis-ga-1923.