Sloan v. . Hart

69 S.E. 50, 153 N.C. 183, 1910 N.C. LEXIS 47
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 12, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 69 S.E. 50 (Sloan v. . Hart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sloan v. . Hart, 69 S.E. 50, 153 N.C. 183, 1910 N.C. LEXIS 47 (N.C. 1910).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This ease was before tbis Court at Spring Term, 1909, and is reported 150 N. C., 269. By the opinions then rendered certain matters were settled. It was settled tbat the defendants made a valid and binding contract of lease witb the plaintiffs, and tbat there bad been a breach of tbat contract, for which breach plaintiffs were entitled to recover damages; tbat the entire damages for the breach of the contract are to be recovered in tbis action; tbat the trial judge committed error in bis charge to the jury as to damages, and tbat the defendants were entitled to a new trial upon the issue as to damages.

Under our judgment tbe Superior Court bad no power to try any other issue except tbat relating to damage.

In tbe trial before Judge Cooke at May Term, 1910, tbe issue as to damage was again submitted to tbe jury. We find no reversible error and are of opinion tbat bis Honor carefully followed tbe rule of damage laid down in tbe opinion of tbis Court.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ANDREWS & KNOWLES PRODUCE COMPANY v. Currin
90 S.E.2d 228 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 S.E. 50, 153 N.C. 183, 1910 N.C. LEXIS 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sloan-v-hart-nc-1910.