Sloan v. Freedom Savings & Loan Ass'n

525 So. 2d 1000, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1272, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2176, 1988 WL 51634
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 26, 1988
DocketNo. 87-2138
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 525 So. 2d 1000 (Sloan v. Freedom Savings & Loan Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sloan v. Freedom Savings & Loan Ass'n, 525 So. 2d 1000, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1272, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2176, 1988 WL 51634 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in a promissory note guaranty case.

We affirm the summary judgment and take this opportunity to rectify a situation we created in Lauxmont Farms, Inc. v. Flavin, 514 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). In Lauxmont, we said:

Although a default judgment can be entered to establish liability a trial is necessary to establish unliquidated damages. Therefore, the award of unliquidated compensatory damages by summary judgment in this case was error [citations omitted].
* * * * * *
Lauxmont Farms’ fundamental due process rights were violated by the defective notice of nonjury trial for both compensatory and punitive damages as well as attorneys fees and costs.

Id. at 1134.

We are advised that this Lauxmont opinion has been taken to mean that attorneys fees and costs cannot be determined and awarded by summary judgment. This interpretation is reasonable because we said "... the award of unliquidated compensatory damages by summary judgment ” is error. We should have said (and this author protests he meant to say!) “the award of unliquidated damages by default” is error.1

So, any claim for damages, liquidated or unliquidated, or for attorneys fees and costs can be decided by summary judgment. Unliquidated damages cannot be awarded after default without notice to the defendant of the hearing or trial where the damages are to be assessed and awarded. Bowman v. Kingsland Development, Inc., 432 So.2d 660 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Appellate judges are wont to decorate some of their opinions with Latin phrases. The appropriate one for this occasion is mea culpa.

AFFIRMED.

COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

R. Plants, Inc. v. Dome Enterprises, Inc.
221 So. 3d 752 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Bodygear Activewear, Inc. v. Counter Intelligence Services
946 So. 2d 1148 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Greenwood v. Nicklaus
527 So. 2d 964 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
525 So. 2d 1000, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1272, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2176, 1988 WL 51634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sloan-v-freedom-savings-loan-assn-fladistctapp-1988.