Sloan v. Diamond

191 A.D.2d 226, 595 N.Y.S.2d 678

This text of 191 A.D.2d 226 (Sloan v. Diamond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sloan v. Diamond, 191 A.D.2d 226, 595 N.Y.S.2d 678 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Irma Santaella, J.), entered February 7, 1992, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for vacatur of a stipulation of settlement, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs did not demonstrate fraud, collusion, mistake, accident, surprise or other similar ground for vacatur (see, Matter of Frutiger, 29 NY2d 143, 150). The underlying litigation was discontinued with prejudice by the terms of the stipulation and a second stipulation in a related action. Facts pertinent to the underlying litigation were therefore immaterial (Newman v Holland, 178 AD2d 866, 867). Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Asch and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Estate of Frutiger
272 N.E.2d 543 (New York Court of Appeals, 1971)
Newman v. Holland
178 A.D.2d 866 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 A.D.2d 226, 595 N.Y.S.2d 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sloan-v-diamond-nyappdiv-1993.