Sloan v. City of Madison Heights
Opinion
Gerald T. SLOAN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF MADISON HEIGHTS, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 27, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the decision of the Court of Appeals and REINSTATE the orders of the Oakland Circuit Court granting summary disposition in favor of the plaintiff. The plain language of the collective bargaining agreement that provided health insurance to "retirees and their spouses" did not limit spousal coverage to the person who was the retiree's spouse at the time of retirement or at the time of the agreement's expiration.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
711 N.W.2d 338 (Sloan v. City of Madison Heights) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.