Sloan v. City of Madison Heights
This text of 711 N.W.2d 338 (Sloan v. City of Madison Heights) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Gerald T. SLOAN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF MADISON HEIGHTS, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 27, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the decision of the Court of Appeals and REINSTATE the orders of the Oakland Circuit Court granting summary disposition in favor of the plaintiff. The plain language of the collective bargaining agreement that provided health insurance to "retirees and their spouses" did not limit spousal coverage to the person who was the retiree's spouse at the time of retirement or at the time of the agreement's expiration.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
711 N.W.2d 338, 474 Mich. 1085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sloan-v-city-of-madison-heights-mich-2006.