Sloan, Q., Pet v. Superintendent Harry
This text of Sloan, Q., Pet v. Superintendent Harry (Sloan, Q., Pet v. Superintendent Harry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
QUAYSHAWN SLOAN, : No. 11 WM 2021 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HARRY, : SUPERINTENDENT ASSISTANT TONYA : HEIST, UNIT MANAGER TIM HORNUNG, : COUNSELOR THEODORE NUGIN, : LIBRARIAN ALEXANDRA HAUBRICK, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 23rd day of April, 2021, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process is GRANTED, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED, and the “Application
for Relief to File an Untimely Answer” is DISMISSED AS MOOT.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sloan, Q., Pet v. Superintendent Harry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sloan-q-pet-v-superintendent-harry-pa-2021.