Sloan, Q., Pet v. Superintendent Harry

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 23, 2021·No. 11 WM 2021·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

QUAYSHAWN SLOAN, : No. 11 WM 2021 :

Petitioner :

: :

v. :

: :

SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HARRY, : SUPERINTENDENT ASSISTANT TONYA : HEIST, UNIT MANAGER TIM HORNUNG, : COUNSELOR THEODORE NUGIN, : LIBRARIAN ALEXANDRA HAUBRICK, :

:

Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of April, 2021, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process is GRANTED, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED, and the “Application

for Relief to File an Untimely Answer” is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sloan, Q., Pet v. Superintendent Harry, (Pa. 2021).

Sloan, Q., Pet v. Superintendent Harry (Sloan, Q., Pet v. Superintendent Harry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.