Slizyk v. Smilack

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Slizyk v. Smilack

716 So. 2d 288, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8180, 1998 WL 380494

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 10, 1998

DocketNo. 97-929

StatusPublished

This text of 716 So. 2d 288 (Slizyk v. Smilack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Slizyk v. Smilack, 716 So. 2d 288, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8180, 1998 WL 380494 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

GRIFFIN, Chief Judge.

We conclude that as to all appealed orders, save two, there is either no jurisdiction to review them or the claim of error was not preserved by timely objection below. As for the order terminating temporary alimony and the order denying temporary suit money, although there is conflicting evidence concerning the husband’s financial condition, the [289]*289court’s ruling is supported by evidence in the record.

AFFIRMED.

W. SHARP and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRIFFIN, Chief Judge.

We conclude that as to all appealed orders, save two, there is either no jurisdiction to review them or the claim of error was not preserved by timely objection below. As for the order terminating temporary alimony and the order denying temporary suit money, although there is conflicting evidence concerning the husband’s financial condition, the [289]*289court’s ruling is supported by evidence in the record.

AFFIRMED.

W. SHARP and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

716 So. 2d 288, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8180, 1998 WL 380494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slizyk-v-smilack-fladistctapp-1998.