Slivkina v. County of Westchester

250 A.D.2d 754, 672 N.Y.S.2d 780

This text of 250 A.D.2d 754 (Slivkina v. County of Westchester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Slivkina v. County of Westchester, 250 A.D.2d 754, 672 N.Y.S.2d 780 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—In two related actions, inter alia, to recover damages for false arrest, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution, the plaintiffs in Action Nos. 1 and 2 [755]*755appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Silverman, J.), entered March 4, 1997, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendants and against them.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The jury’s verdict was based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence and we discern no reason to disturb it (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Joy and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nicastro v. Park
113 A.D.2d 129 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
250 A.D.2d 754, 672 N.Y.S.2d 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slivkina-v-county-of-westchester-nyappdiv-1998.