Slisz v. Miga

15 A.D.3d 955, 788 N.Y.S.2d 923
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Slisz v. Miga. Read the opinion of the Court — 15 A.D.3d 953
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 4, 2005·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John A. Michalek, J.), entered January 26, 2004. The order granted plaintiffs motion for leave to reargue but, upon reargument, adhered to the prior decision.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by denying the cross motion in part and reinstating the 90/180 category of serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Slisz v Miga (15 AD3d 953 [2005]). Present — Pigott, Jr., PJ., Pine, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Slisz v. Miga, 15 A.D.3d 955, 788 N.Y.S.2d 923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

15 A.D.3d 955 (Slisz v. Miga) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slisz v. Miga
15 A.D.3d 953 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)