Slip Track Systems, Inc. v. Metal-Lite, Inc.

168 F. App'x 943
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided February 10, 2006·No. No. 05-1491·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON MOTION

SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Slip Track Systems, Inc. and Todd A. Brady (Slip Track) move to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California in district court case no. 98-20. Slip Track also moves for each side to bear its own costs. Metal-Lite, Inc. et al. (Metal-Lite) oppose and moves for sanctions. Slip Track replies.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Slip Track’s motion to dismiss is granted.

(2) Slip Track’s motion for each side to bear its own costs is denied. Costs awarded to Metal-Lite. In addition to costs for briefs, Metal-Lite may also recover costs for motions and responses.

(3) Metal-Lite’s motion for sanctions is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Slip Track Systems, Inc. v. Metal-Lite, Inc., 168 F. App'x 943 (Fed. Cir. 2006).

168 F. App'x 943 (Slip Track Systems, Inc. v. Metal-Lite, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brady Construction Innovations, Inc. v. Perfect Wall, Inc.
290 F. App'x 358 (Federal Circuit, 2008)