Slip Track Systems, Inc. v. Metal-Lite, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Slip Track Systems, Inc. v. Metal-Lite, Inc.

168 F. App'x 943

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedFebruary 10, 2006

DocketNo. 05-1491

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 168 F. App'x 943 (Slip Track Systems, Inc. v. Metal-Lite, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Slip Track Systems, Inc. v. Metal-Lite, Inc., 168 F. App'x 943 (Fed. Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION

SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Slip Track Systems, Inc. and Todd A. Brady (Slip Track) move to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California in district court case no. 98-20. Slip Track also moves for each side to bear its own costs. Metal-Lite, Inc. et al. (Metal-Lite) oppose and moves for sanctions. Slip Track replies.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Slip Track’s motion to dismiss is granted.

(2) Slip Track’s motion for each side to bear its own costs is denied. Costs awarded to Metal-Lite. In addition to costs for briefs, Metal-Lite may also recover costs for motions and responses.

(3) Metal-Lite’s motion for sanctions is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI