Home/D.C. Circuit/Slinger Drainage, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency

Slinger Drainage, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency

244 F.3d 968, 345 U.S. App. D.C. 288, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 6591
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Slinger Drainage, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency. Read the opinion of the Court — 237 F.3d 681 →
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided April 13, 2001·No. No. 99-1433·Published

Opinions

A statement of Circuit Judge WILLIAMS dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc is attached.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Petitioner’s petition for rehearing en banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

[969]*969ORDERED that the petition be denied.

A separate Memorandum Opinion supporting the denial of rehearing is attached to the order denying the petition for panel rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Slinger Drainage, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency, 244 F.3d 968, 345 U.S. App. D.C. 288, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 6591 (D.C. Cir. 2001).

244 F.3d 968 (Slinger Drainage, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
802 F.2d 47 (Second Circuit, 1986)