Slimack v. Tofany

32 A.D.2d 873, 302 N.Y.S.2d 56, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3674
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 19, 1969
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 32 A.D.2d 873 (Slimack v. Tofany) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Slimack v. Tofany, 32 A.D.2d 873, 302 N.Y.S.2d 56, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3674 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The denial by the Hearing Referee of the motion by petitioner’s attorney to dismiss the charge that petitioner refused to submit to a chemical test to determine the alcoholic content of his blood, by reason of a Deputy Sheriff’s failure to appear on the first hearing date, and the Referee’s adjournment of the matter to a later date, did not constitute an abuse of discretion and his rulings were not arbitrary and capricious. (Appeal from judgment of Cayuga Special Term annulling determination of Commissioner which revoked operator’s license.) Present—'Del Vecchio, J. P., Marsh, Gabrielli, Moule and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Andrews v. Oklahoma Department of Public Safety
1979 OK 50 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 A.D.2d 873, 302 N.Y.S.2d 56, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slimack-v-tofany-nyappdiv-1969.