Slife v. Borough of Dorranceton
105 A. 39, 262 Pa. 182, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 616
Opinion
This judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned court below refusing defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Slife v. Borough of Dorranceton, 105 A. 39, 262 Pa. 182, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 616 (Pa. 1918).
105 A. 39 (Slife v. Borough of Dorranceton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. Flannery
119 A.2d 224 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1956)
Weismiller Et Vir. v. Farrell
34 A.2d 45 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
Coyle v. New Kensington
9 A.2d 405 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)
Lumley v. Grove City Borough
191 A. 126 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Fleming Fleming v. City of Phila.
85 Pa. Super. 172 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Duvall v. City of New Castle
74 Pa. Super. 573 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)