S.L.G. v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

S.L.G. v. State

950 So. 2d 400, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 86, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 242, 2007 WL 416090

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedFebruary 8, 2007

DocketNo. SC05-1953

StatusPublished

This text of 950 So. 2d 400 (S.L.G. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

S.L.G. v. State, 950 So. 2d 400, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 86, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 242, 2007 WL 416090 (Fla. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review S.L.G. v. State, 912 So.2d 613 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (on motion for rehearing), in which the Fifth District Court of Appeal certified the same question as was then pending review in this Court via V.K.E. v. State, 902 So.2d 343 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), quashed, 934 So.2d 1276 (Fla.2006). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We have since answered the certified question in a manner contrary to the decision presently on review. See V.K.E. v. State, 934 So.2d 1276 (Fla.2006). We have thus determined, and respondent agrees, that we should exercise our jurisdiction to grant the petition for review, quash the decision under review, and remand to the Fifth District Court of Appeal for reconsideration upon application of this Court’s decision in V.K.E.

It is so ordered.

LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, and QUINCE, JJ., concur. CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur in result only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI