S.L.F. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

S.L.F. v. State

728 So. 2d 820, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3314, 1999 WL 147380

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 19, 1999

DocketNo. 98-3157

StatusPublished

This text of 728 So. 2d 820 (S.L.F. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

S.L.F. v. State, 728 So. 2d 820, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3314, 1999 WL 147380 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without comment the trial court’s ruling admitting defendant’s confession into evidence but reverse the trial court’s written order finding appellant guilty as a principal to grand theft given the court’s earlier oral pronouncement finding defendant guilty of the lesser included offense of principal to petit theft. Thus, we remand for entry of an order consistent with the trial court’s oral pronouncement.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

JOANOS, MINER and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without comment the trial court’s ruling admitting defendant’s confession into evidence but reverse the trial court’s written order finding appellant guilty as a principal to grand theft given the court’s earlier oral pronouncement finding defendant guilty of the lesser included offense of principal to petit theft. Thus, we remand for entry of an order consistent with the trial court’s oral pronouncement.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

JOANOS, MINER and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

728 So. 2d 820, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3314, 1999 WL 147380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slf-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.