Sley v. United States
This text of 77 F.2d 1013 (Sley v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon consideration of the motion by the United States attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, made on June 5, 1935, that the judgment of the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (8 F.Supp. 136) be reversed, pursuant to the recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of United States v. Schechter, 55 S. Ct. 837, 79 L. Ed. -, declaring the National Industrial Recovery Act (48 Stat. 195) unconstitutional, which motion was joined in by counsel for appellant. It is ordered that the judgment of the said District Court in this cause be and the same is hereby reversed.
DAVIS and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 F.2d 1013, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sley-v-united-states-ca3-1935.