Sleph v. Grossman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Sleph v. Grossman

192 Ill. App. 67

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMarch 12, 1915

DocketGen. No. 20,114

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 192 Ill. App. 67 (Sleph v. Grossman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sleph v. Grossman, 192 Ill. App. 67 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Pam

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 8*—when action commenced hy attachment not for unliquidated damages. An action to recover an alleged overpayment on a purchase by plaintiff, commenced by attachment in the Municipal Court, is improperly dismissed as being an action to recover unliquidated damages, where the question in dispute was the amount of material shipped to plaintiff by defendant and not its value. 3. Appearance, § 8*—what constitutes general. The filing of an affidavit of merits and claim of set-off constitutes a general appearance, conferring jurisdiction over the parties. 4. Appeal and error, § 551*—when exceptions unnecessary. An adverse ruling under Practice Act, sec. 81 (J. & A. If 8618) may be reviewed on appeal or error without a formal exception. 5. Trial, § 290*—when propositions of law unnecessary. The purpose subserved by propositions of law is to determine whether the trial judge entertains correct views of the principles of law involved in the proceeding, and, hence, they are unnecessary where the ruling of the court itself showed the principles of law which the court applied to the facts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Pam

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 8*—when action commenced hy attachment not for unliquidated damages. An action to recover an alleged overpayment on a purchase by plaintiff, commenced by attachment in the Municipal Court, is improperly dismissed as being an action to recover unliquidated damages, where the question in dispute was the amount of material shipped to plaintiff by defendant and not its value. 3. Appearance, § 8*—what constitutes general. The filing of an affidavit of merits and claim of set-off constitutes a general appearance, conferring jurisdiction over the parties. 4. Appeal and error, § 551*—when exceptions unnecessary. An adverse ruling under Practice Act, sec. 81 (J. & A. If 8618) may be reviewed on appeal or error without a formal exception. 5. Trial, § 290*—when propositions of law unnecessary. The purpose subserved by propositions of law is to determine whether the trial judge entertains correct views of the principles of law involved in the proceeding, and, hence, they are unnecessary where the ruling of the court itself showed the principles of law which the court applied to the facts.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 Ill. App. 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sleph-v-grossman-illappct-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack