Slentz v. Everts

Court of Appeals of Texas

Slentz v. Everts

78 S.W.2d 1118

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 31, 1935

DocketNo. 3140

StatusPublished

This text of 78 S.W.2d 1118 (Slentz v. Everts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Slentz v. Everts, 78 S.W.2d 1118 (Tex. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

WALTHALD, Justice,

Appellant brought this suit against appel-lee to recover a sum of money alleged to be an unpaid balance "due upon a contract for the purchase of ari oil and gas lease in a block of land in Rusk county, Tex.

The issues were tried before the court without a jury. The court made and filed findings of fact and conclusions of law, found in the record. The issues of fact found were all in favor of appellee, upon which the court entered judgment. Appellant perfected an appeal from the judgment, but has filed no brief.

We have found no fundamental error. The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WALTHALD, Justice,

Appellant brought this suit against appel-lee to recover a sum of money alleged to be an unpaid balance "due upon a contract for the purchase of ari oil and gas lease in a block of land in Rusk county, Tex.

The issues were tried before the court without a jury. The court made and filed findings of fact and conclusions of law, found in the record. The issues of fact found were all in favor of appellee, upon which the court entered judgment. Appellant perfected an appeal from the judgment, but has filed no brief.

We have found no fundamental error. The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 S.W.2d 1118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slentz-v-everts-texapp-1935.