Sledge v. State

936 So. 2d 776, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14612, 2006 WL 2516517
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sledge v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 871 So. 2d 1020
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 1, 2006·No. No. 5D06-2763·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

See Daniels v. State, 491 So.2d 543, 545 (Fla.1986) (explaining that if defendant does not receive concurrent sentences on multiple charges, he is not entitled to have his jail time credit “pyramided” by being given credit on each sentence for the time he spends in jail awaiting disposition).

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sledge v. State, 936 So. 2d 776, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14612, 2006 WL 2516517 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

936 So. 2d 776 (Sledge v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniels v. State
491 So. 2d 543 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)