Slayton v. Hammer

Supreme Court

Slayton v. Hammer

412 U.S. 935, 93 S. Ct. 2769

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 11, 1973

DocketNo. 71-1245; No. 71-1472; No. 71-1495; No. 72-400

StatusPublished

This text of 412 U.S. 935 (Slayton v. Hammer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Slayton v. Hammer, 412 U.S. 935, 93 S. Ct. 2769 (1973).

Pincite

Opinion

C. A. 4th Cir.;

C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 456 F. 2d 469 ;

C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 457 F. 2d 365; and

C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 465 F. 2d 727. Motions of respondents for leave to- proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgments vacated and cases remanded for further consideration in light of Michigan v. Payne, ante, p. 47, and Chaffin v. Stynchcombe, ante, p. 17.

Mr. Justice Douglas would affirm the judgments.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. A. 4th Cir.;

C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 456 F. 2d 469 ;

C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 457 F. 2d 365; and

C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 465 F. 2d 727. Motions of respondents for leave to- proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgments vacated and cases remanded for further consideration in light of Michigan v. Payne, ante, p. 47, and Chaffin v. Stynchcombe, ante, p. 17.

Mr. Justice Douglas would affirm the judgments.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

412 U.S. 935, 93 S. Ct. 2769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slayton-v-hammer-scotus-1973.

Opinion

C. A. 4th Cir.;

C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 456 F. 2d 469 ;

C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 457 F. 2d 365; and

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack