Slay v. Farley

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Slay v. Farley

1 Gunby 100

DecidedJuly 1, 1885

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Gunby 100 (Slay v. Farley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Slay v. Farley, 1 Gunby 100 (La. Ct. App. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

J. D. S. Newell, Special Judge.

Where the mules on a plantation are not mentioned in the mortgage, nor in the sheriff’s notice of seizure, appraisement, advertisement and act of sale, it will be held that the mules attached to the plantation were not mortgaged nor sold.

2. Where a receipt between two parties specifies that one of them still owes the other a specified amount, unless explained, said receipt will be presumed to evidence a fall settlement of all prior claims between the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. D. S. Newell, Special Judge.

Where the mules on a plantation are not mentioned in the mortgage, nor in the sheriff’s notice of seizure, appraisement, advertisement and act of sale, it will be held that the mules attached to the plantation were not mortgaged nor sold.

2. Where a receipt between two parties specifies that one of them still owes the other a specified amount, unless explained, said receipt will be presumed to evidence a fall settlement of all prior claims between the parties.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Gunby 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slay-v-farley-lactapp-1885.