Slay v. Babin Motors, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Slay v. Babin Motors, Inc.

451 So. 2d 638, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 8740

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 16, 1984

DocketNo. 83-565

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 451 So. 2d 638 (Slay v. Babin Motors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Slay v. Babin Motors, Inc., 451 So. 2d 638, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 8740 (La. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

DOMENGEAUX, Judge.

This case was consolidated at trial with Mott v. Babin Motors, Inc., et al, 451 So.2d 632 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1984) (No. 83-564), and remains as such on appeal. Appellant Slay devolutively appealed the judgment of the trial court; however, appellant Slay has neither filed an appellate brief on his behalf nor did appellant appear in person or through counsel when the case was called for argument. Therefore, the appeal is considered abandoned and accordingly dismissed with appellate costs against the appellant. Woods v. Woods, 128 So.2d 796 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1961); Paul v. Rimrock Tidelands, Inc., 128 So.2d 443 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1961); La.C.C.P. Art. 2164.

DECREE

For the above and foregoing reasons, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed, with appellate costs assessed against appellant.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOMENGEAUX, Judge.

This case was consolidated at trial with Mott v. Babin Motors, Inc., et al, 451 So.2d 632 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1984) (No. 83-564), and remains as such on appeal. Appellant Slay devolutively appealed the judgment of the trial court; however, appellant Slay has neither filed an appellate brief on his behalf nor did appellant appear in person or through counsel when the case was called for argument. Therefore, the appeal is considered abandoned and accordingly dismissed with appellate costs against the appellant. Woods v. Woods, 128 So.2d 796 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1961); Paul v. Rimrock Tidelands, Inc., 128 So.2d 443 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1961); La.C.C.P. Art. 2164.

DECREE

For the above and foregoing reasons, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed, with appellate costs assessed against appellant.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

451 So. 2d 638, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 8740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slay-v-babin-motors-inc-lactapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack