Slawsky v. Eldrid

238 A.D. 799

This text of 238 A.D. 799 (Slawsky v. Eldrid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Slawsky v. Eldrid, 238 A.D. 799 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Order denying motion to change the place of trial and to consolidate actions affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur; Kapper and Davis, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and to grant the motion on authority of Gibbs v. Sokol (216 App. Div. 260) and Rose v. Town of Richmond (214 id. 142, 144).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gibbs v. Sokol
216 A.D. 260 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
238 A.D. 799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slawsky-v-eldrid-nyappdiv-1933.