Slawinski v. Slawinski

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Slawinski v. Slawinski

481 So. 2d 107, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6040

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 15, 1986

DocketNo. 85-2812

StatusPublished

This text of 481 So. 2d 107 (Slawinski v. Slawinski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Slawinski v. Slawinski, 481 So. 2d 107, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6040 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION TO REVIEW BOND

PER CURIAM.

The husband has filed a motion, pursuant to Rule 9.310(f), Fla.R.App.P., to review the amount of bond established by the trial court. In response, the wife has confessed error, admitting that the present dollar figure is too high. See generally Rule 9.310, Fla.R.App.P. Accordingly, the trial court’s bond determination is reversed and the cause is remanded for imposition of a more appropriate figure.

GLICKSTEIN, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION TO REVIEW BOND

PER CURIAM.

The husband has filed a motion, pursuant to Rule 9.310(f), Fla.R.App.P., to review the amount of bond established by the trial court. In response, the wife has confessed error, admitting that the present dollar figure is too high. See generally Rule 9.310, Fla.R.App.P. Accordingly, the trial court’s bond determination is reversed and the cause is remanded for imposition of a more appropriate figure.

GLICKSTEIN, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

481 So. 2d 107, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slawinski-v-slawinski-fladistctapp-1986.