Slaviz v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

178 A.D. 893

This text of 178 A.D. 893 (Slaviz v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Slaviz v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 178 A.D. 893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Scott, Laughlin,

[894]*894Smith, Page and Shearn, JJ.; Page, J., dissented on the ground that neither the employer nor the employee was engaged in interstate commerce at the time of the accident.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 A.D. 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slaviz-v-new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-nyappdiv-1917.