Slavisa v. Ashcroft
This text of 110 F. App'x 817 (Slavisa v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Mikic Slavisa, Serbian native in Kosovo and citizen of the former Yugoslavia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigra[818]*818tion Appeals’ decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and for relief under the Convention Against Torture. The record establishes that the petitioner did suffer past persecution as a Serbian living in Kosovo. He fled ethnic cleansing by Albanian Kosavars, and his house and store were burned and looted. Such flight from ethnic cleansing constitutes past persecution. See Knezevic v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 1206 (9th Cir.2004). He is therefore entitled to a presumption of a well-founded fear of future persecution if returned to Kosovo. The BIA’s conclusion that he had failed to demonstrate a well-founded fear of future persecution in Kosovo is therefore not supported by substantial evidence in the record.
The BIA did not consider the issue of whether the petitioner could relocate internally within the former Yugoslavia, and we therefore remand for consideration of this issue. See Knezevic.
The petition for review is GRANTED and the matter REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 F. App'x 817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slavisa-v-ashcroft-ca9-2004.