Slavin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Slavin v. State

341 S.W.3d 716, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 665, 2011 WL 1842750

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 17, 2011

DocketWD 71949

StatusPublished

This text of 341 S.W.3d 716 (Slavin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Slavin v. State, 341 S.W.3d 716, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 665, 2011 WL 1842750 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Roy Slavin appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Roy Slavin appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

341 S.W.3d 716, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 665, 2011 WL 1842750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slavin-v-state-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack