Slavin v. State
341 S.W.3d 716, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 665, 2011 WL 1842750
Opinion
ORDER
Roy Slavin appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Slavin v. State, 341 S.W.3d 716, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 665, 2011 WL 1842750 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
341 S.W.3d 716 (Slavin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
River City Drywall, Inc. v. Raleigh Properties, Inc.
341 S.W.3d 716 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)