Slavin v. Rasch

242 S.W.3d 371, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1384, 2007 WL 2916145
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 9, 2007·No. ED 89048·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stuart Slavin and Daniel Lieberman appeal from the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of David J. and Diane Har-ter, Pacific Indemnity Co. and Chubb & Son, Inc. (Respondents). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that Respondents were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Slavin v. Rasch, 242 S.W.3d 371, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1384, 2007 WL 2916145 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

242 S.W.3d 371 (Slavin v. Rasch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fisher v. Shults
242 S.W.3d 371 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)