Slavin v. Rasch
This text of 242 S.W.3d 371 (Slavin v. Rasch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Stuart Slavin and Daniel Lieberman appeal from the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of David J. and Diane Har-ter, Pacific Indemnity Co. and Chubb & Son, Inc. (Respondents). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that Respondents were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 S.W.3d 371, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1384, 2007 WL 2916145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slavin-v-rasch-moctapp-2007.